
The Albanese government has agreed to ban new limited recourse borrowing arrangements (LRBAs) for residential property inside superannuation funds. The ban commences 45 days after royal assent. Existing arrangements are untouched. In-progress arrangements may qualify under the transition provisions. New residential LRBAs after commencement are prohibited. Note: this article is based on the bill as introduced and government announcements. The Act has not yet received royal assent. Final legislative detail may differ. Do not rely on specific dates or transition requirements until the Act is published and the commencement date confirmed.
Schedule 5 of the bill amends section 67A of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993. The LRBA exception — which permits super funds to borrow by way of limited recourse arrangements — is amended to exclude residential real property. For real property to remain eligible, it must be business real property within the meaning of section 66. Residential property no longer qualifies.
Three categories remain protected under the transition provisions in item 2 of Schedule 5:
The contract date — not settlement date, and not the date the full LRBA structure is established — appears to be the relevant threshold for the acquisition limb. However, the borrowing arrangement itself is a separate question. Legal advice should be obtained for any specific arrangement.
The ban reflects long-running regulatory concern. Super funds are generally prohibited from borrowing to invest; LRBAs were the exception, used almost exclusively by SMSFs. The 2014 Murray Financial System Inquiry flagged the risks of leveraged property inside retirement vehicles. The Council of Financial Regulators raised the same concerns in 2019 and 2022. The affected segment is modest — less than 1 per cent of residential property borrowing runs through SMSFs — and the measure is estimated to improve the budget by $50 million.
The LRBA ban was also the political price for Senate passage of the broader investor tax package, which abolished the 50 per cent CGT discount for investments (replacing it with inflation-adjusted real gain taxation) and tightened negative gearing for future investment properties, with existing arrangements grandfathered. A second technical bill covering trust-related detail is due later in the year.
The broader reform context is also shifting. The LRBA ban runs alongside the abolition of the 50 per cent CGT discount and tightened negative gearing rules, so the overall economics of geared property — inside and outside super — are changing at the same time.
Funds with existing residential LRBAs that have a compliance breach face a specific risk. Under the legislation, the transition exception attaches to borrowing arrangements entered into before commencement. A restructure of a non-compliant arrangement could constitute a new borrowing arrangement — not a continuation of the original — and therefore fall outside the exception. A genuinely new residential LRBA after commencement is prohibited. The fund may find itself unable to legally maintain the corrected structure.
The legislation does not expressly address this scenario. ATO guidance may clarify it in due course, but does not yet exist. Trustees and advisers managing funds with known or potential LRBA compliance issues should consider whether remediation can occur before commencement. Auditors who identify LRBA contraventions in the 2025 cycle should flag this risk explicitly when raising the matter with trustees and their advisers.
The ban is narrow and prospective. Existing LRBAs are unaffected. The key legislative clarity is that a pre-commencement purchase contract should protect the acquisition limb of the transition — settlement can occur after commencement. But the borrowing arrangement is a separate question, the Act is not yet law, and funds with compliance issues in existing arrangements face a specific restructuring risk that needs attention before commencement.
This article is based on the bill as introduced and government announcements. Final legislative detail, including the precise requirements for the transition period, may differ. It does not constitute financial, legal, or tax advice. Confirm the final legislative wording and commencement date before relying on any specific details.
The Auditors Institute | CPD for RCAs & SMSF Auditors
New to the website? Become a member.
See Membership Plan
RCA Webinar is free for
Purchase the appropriate membership to access it
SMSF Webinar is free for
Purchase the appropriate membership to access it