#20095

Hi Lina,

If you are qualifying Part A for insufficient evidence for the property, then you would absolutely have to qualify Part B and likely issue an auditor contravention report, because the size of the property’s value would put it in scope.

I have a few and it will come down to:

*Valuation – do you have sufficient evidence per the ATO QC26343 (sufficient sales of similar properties around 30th June of the year in question)

*Ownership – you’ve headed off

*Reg 13.14 – can you get a title search showing there is no charge over the fund assets (QC73156)

*Leases – ATO are asking for these for s109 (arm’s length) and whether rented to a related party (s62/s65)

If you can’t get all or most of this, I think you’ll be qualifying Part B for multiple issues and an ACR will be inevitable.

Become a member

New to the website? Become a member.

See Membership Plan

FREE ACCESS TO RCA FORUMS

Subscribe to get access to RCA forum and be part of RCA Community.

LOGIN

RCA Webinar is free for eligible members

RCA Webinar is free for

  • Registered Company Auditor Membership
  • SMSF Auditor + Registered Company Auditor Membership
  • Registered Company Auditor + Associate Membership


Purchase the appropriate membership to access it

SMSF Webinar is free for eligible members

SMSF Webinar is free for

  • SMSF Auditor Membership
  • SMSF Auditor + Registered Company Auditor Membership
  • Registered Company Auditor + Associate Membership
  • Associate (Non ASIC Registered Auditor)


Purchase the appropriate membership to access it